THE LAKE NYASA BORDER DISPUTE BETWEEN TANZANIA AND MALAWI: A NEED FOR LEGAL SOLUTION
Abstract
Lake Nyasa has been a focal point of a long standing border dispute between Tanzania and Malawi, which remains unresolved to date. The dispute has impaired diplomatic relations, deterred investment, stalled exploration and inflamed localized tensions. This article navigates the historical, legal and economic facets of the
dispute. It shows how the two international law doctrines: uti possidetis juris and median line/equidistance, are used by the disputants to solidify their claims. To clear this legal quagmire, and being supported by the theory of legal interpretivism, the article argues for the need of a legal solution. A legal solution through adjudication or
arbitration is a matter of necessity to unlock the lake’s abundant economic potential, propel regional intertrade,
upholding peaceful coexistence between Tanzania and Malawi, and ultimately attain sustainable economic
development.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anthony Mzurikwao, Kephas Ugula

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in The Eastern Africa Law Review retain the copyright to their work and grant the University of Dar es Salaam a non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, and distribute the article.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
